WILL??? LOUISVILLE METRO-CITY REALLY COME UP WITH $3BILLION FOR 'PLACE' FOR 'CAMPERS' ' 'Safe, Decent, Affordable and Supportive Housing'
My enttry for this moment reaches back into what I know to be this Community-so-called-for-Liberty-Justice-4All's moral predicates and presumptions, for verily I am of this culture deeply and by heritage and learning, and can rather predict its motivations (by social-frames as psychologists term the factor, of motivated cognition). We are in Louisville of 'Cracker-Nation Provenance,' we are the progeny of ancestors who climbed the WildernessRoad and drifted downriver to this place at "the Falls" and we have baggage that betrays in utterly 'Cracker-ways' what we do in times bad and good, when land is owned and for the dis-owned in a 'Southern-Comfort' by which we still and WILL operate BY WHICH WE DO THE RIGHTEOUS MOVES ONLY WHEN BLOOD RUNS IN THE CULVERTS AND BABIES DIE ON JAILHOUSE DOORSTEPS. . . for that IS THE WAY IN "MY OLE KAINTUCKEE HOME" where some still snicker that the Darkies (as I am so to beigely yet blackly-coungtenanced speak smile some more. . .) sure are gay aren't we gay so queerly to-speak (again referring but to 'myselves'.)
Louisville still aspires to be a genteel Southern town, yet also it is a NIMBY Not-In-My-Back-Yard city, as are many places in North America @ USA. The city here operates broadly on common-law precepts that too often go back to Colonial, "Blackstone Commentary on English Law" cognizing, inasmuch partly is shown by the Kentucky election of judges and our in-every-county "Grand Jury System" which in modern Anglo-style lands would be anagthema, a hearkening to the Kingly "Court of the Star Chamber" and specific to my interest at present we have an ancient, ensconced Lord of the Land system that hearkens to Renaissance/Reformation jurisprudence and even into Medieval notions of Lordly prerogatives upon 'owned land.'
As here and now, it is emphatically true that the One who owns 'title' defined by now 'invisible Euclidian survey lines on terrain' CAN AND DOES DO JUST ABOUT WHAT HE/SHE (MOSTLY HE I THINK 'TIS) WANTS; we do not have the softening notions about just what can be privileged on-the-receiving end of the rental CONTRACT-- for it would appear that such 'equities' as 'tenant' has are to be voided at (in my case) the mere whim/caprice of (say, to be specific for the evidence in MY case, brash and immature) Lord of Land WHO NEED NOT CARE TO EXPLAIN OR EVEN GIVE NOTICE THAT 'LAND' SO EUCLIDLY-INVISIBLY-LINED 'PROPERTY MUST BE
VOIDED, GET OUT, GET OUT GET OUT THE REEVE-OF-THE-SHIRE SHERIFF EVICTS ON THE WHIM TO WHICH THIS ALLUSION PERTAINS.
YET!!!Even in Christian Europe from whence this Lord-of-Land priority derives had SOME TRADITIONS that counter this set of LandLordly precepts which of course embed much of the Anglo-American Capitalism. Simply put, the very Christianity from which our modern culture in part-largely grew recognized that Our Jesus had only tenuous/tentative ideas about just what place the notion of 'property' has in a culture so-spirited with the Nazarene/Nazarite value of POVERTY as TheMasterSoTermed denies having as much as a 'place to lay his head.'
The Franciscan Order at least from its inception with Francis strongly deemed ownership of property to be anathema to Christian Discipleship; when the Avignon Pope disagreed with the Order, there was an able advocate for the no-property idea who argued the 'strong Franciscan' position of property-less land use in the person of William of Ockham, whose 'political work' The Work of Ninety Days held that the most-directive form of sway one might have over real property needs to be considered as ITS USE WHEN PRODUCTIVE OF EQUITY "usufrucht (Latin=> usus, use; fructus, fruit, production). As argued to this point Native Americans like Chief Tecumseh, the Christian position taken by Franciscan Ockham is THAT WE DO NOT OWN LAND, THAT MERE CONSQUEST AND THE WINNING OF TRIAL BY BATTLE'S WAGER (the same, in much more-hygenic terms as court-trials pertaining to land in all Anglo- places today) WE CAN ONLY CLAIM USE OF LAND, NOT ITS OWNERSHIP WHICH IS THE PREROGATIVE OF JAHWEH, GOD, ALLAH (AS MUSLIMS CALL GOD).
I do not hold views much different than this William of Ockham, and not because I am a little-c catholic who happens to witness a raw ejection from the equity I had gained by essentially 20 years of utterly rent-paid compliance with the whim of the Lord of the Land, I do too base my ideas about these matters on what would be recognizable as due-recognition that the tenant by usufrucht can and often as in my case develop gifts to Culture that are intrinsically valuable for community edification and societal wisdom that cannot cheapen by dumping-dumpster-ly all the Coptic- Greek- Latin- Aramaic- gifts for my village into a LANDFILL FOR THE RAINS AND ROT TO RUIN;
I for example contracted with Mr. Arthur Bryant now of Royal Oak Drive now with manageress Erica Bryant who WITHOUT NOTICE WITHOUT STATED CAUSE KICKED ME, AND MY CULTURED GI\FTS FOR LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY, FOR USA FOR WORLD on this last May 12, in such a way as not done to the abiding grand-larcenists, sex-offenders, drug-dealers-selling-lethal-H, or the prostitutes with red lamps to culture my part of Louisville; for me, any warning in advance say in 2020 of impending non-continuance of lease WOULD CERTAINLY MEAN THAT I WOULD ALTER MY MIEN TO PLEASE-- ERICA OR ARTHUR BRYANT-- TO SOME EXTENT EVEN TO PLEASE THE NEIGHBORS, NO MATTER THEIR BY-SOME-QUESTIONABLE HABITS (about which the Police LMPD seemed to abet approve, not so for my sometime visit of Cops for matters like speaking on my balcony about announcements from my-me to my-public at large).
Usufrucht! The equity produced by me in tenure tenancy under the Bryant Lord of Land (at 3640 Manslick Road #18, 40215) allowance; I HAD SOME USUFRUCHT by proferring rent $ to thousands for those who needed themselves to stave off eviction, by providing condoms and yes cigarettes for the commercial-sex-workers-locally, for providing an electric generator for those 'without juice,' for visiting our complex' jailed and infirm, for husbandry of a perfect-1000%-effective-mousing-cat to truly reduce (with nods from the Lords of the Land) rodent problem in this complex).
BUT THE LORD OF THE LAND!!!! WHAT A WHIZ IT IS THAT FOR NO SPOKEN REASON, FOR ANY REASON THAT COULD NOT BE CONTRADICTED BY EQUAL-ADMINISTRATION WITH THE MAJORITY-CRIMINAL-AND-DERELICT NEIGHBORS,
WHIZ!!! I AM HOMELESS, THE H DEALERS AND 'HOARS' (I USE THE TERM HAIRY IT IS TO AVOID THE OBVIOUS COUNTER-CLAIM OF DEFAMED-CHARACTER laugh), AND THE SEX OFFENDERS AND THE HUMAN TRAFFICKERS IN THE OAKS (repeat 3640 Manslick Road 40215);
will I forget? no i shall not forget this! for-give? i shall give-for a metanoia (which in Greek for the New Testament means repentance); i shall endeavor to change-mind all over that what by the fruit of use in a lease contract needs and needed to have been equity that SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN RAINED UPON ROTTED AS TO-DUMPSTER FOR THE LOUISVILLE LANDFILL. . .
so i shall not FOR GET; that for-which-i-give for-give will be of a prophetic, yes 'hollering' evicted rentpayer's religious and advocational order!!!!
Comments
Post a Comment